Abstract
Because the North American Breeding Bird Survey provides inadequate coverage of wetland habitat, the Wetland Breeding Bird Survey was recently established in Ohio, USA. This program relies on volunteers to conduct 3 counts at each monitored wetland. Currently, all counts are conducted during the morning. Under the premise that volunteer participation could be increased by allowing evening counts, we evaluated the potential for modifying the methodology. We evaluated the sampling efficiency of all 3-count combinations of morning and evening counts using data collected at 14 wetlands. Estimates of overall species richness decreased with increasing numbers of evening counts. However, this pattern did not hold when analyses were restricted to wetland-dependent species or those of conservation concern. Our findings suggest that it would be reasonable to permit evening counts, particularly if the data are to be used to monitor wetland-dependent species and those of concern.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Literature cited
Andres, B. 1991. Wetland Breeding Bird Survey. Unpublished report. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife. Columbus, OH, USA.
Bird Studies Canada and Environment Canada. 2001. The Great Lakes marsh monitoring program (http://www.bsc-eoc.org/mmpmain.html).
Brockman, S. C. 1998. Physiographic regions of Ohio. Ohio Division of Geologic Survey (http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/odnr/geo_survey/gen/map/physio.htm).
Brown, S. C. and C. R. Smith. 1998. Breeding season bird use of recently restored versus natural wetlands in New York. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:1480–1491.
Craig, R. J. and K. G. Beal. 1992. The influence of habitat variables on the marsh bird communities of the Connecticut River estuary. Wilson Bulletin 104:295–311.
Dahl, T. E., C. E. Johnson, and W. E. Frayer. 1991. Wetlands status and trends in the conterminous United States, mid-1970s to mid-1980s. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
Gibbs, J. P. and S. M. Melvin. 1997. Power to detect trends in waterbird abundance with call-response surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:1262–1267.
Herkert, J. R. 1995. An analysis of midwestern breeding bird population trends: 1966–1993. American Midland Naturalist 134:41–50.
Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2000. Geographic information management systems (http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/gims/).
Peterjohn, B. G., R. L. Hannikman, J. M. Hoffman, and E. J. Turner. 1987. Abundance and distribution of the birds of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Notes 19.
Ralph, C. J., G. R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. E. Martin, and D. F. DeSante. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, USA. PSW-GTR-144.
Ralph, C. J., J. R. Sauer, and S. Droege (eds.). 1995. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. U.S. Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, USA. PSW-GTR-149.
Ribic, C. A., S. J. Lewis, S. Melvin, J. Bart, and B. Peterjohn. 1999. Proceedings of the marsh bird monitoring workshop. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Research Refuge. Laurel, MD, USA.
Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, I. Thomas, J. Fallon, and G. Gough. 2000. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966–1999, version 98.1 (http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html), Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA.
SigmaStat, version 2.0. 1997. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
Swift, B. L., J. S. Larson, and R. M. DeGraff 1984. Relationship of breeding bird density and diversity to habitat variables in forested wetlands. Wilson Bulletin 96:48–59.
United States Supreme Court. 2001. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County, petitioner v. United States Army Corp of Engineers et al. No. 99-1178.
Weeber, R. C., J. D. McCracken, and C. M. Francis. 1999. The marsh monitoring program of Bird Studies Canada (Long Point Bird Observatory). p. 51–52. In C. A. Ribic, S. J. Lewis, S. Melvin, J. Bart, and B. Peterjohn (eds.) Proceedings of the marsh bird monitoring workshop. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Research Refuge, Laurel, MD, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krzys, G., Waite, T.A., Stapanian, M. et al. Assessing avian richness in remnant wetlands: Towards an improved methodology. Wetlands 22, 186–190 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0186:AARIRW]2.0.CO;2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0186:AARIRW]2.0.CO;2
Key Words
- avian diversity
- evening surveys
- point counts
- sampling efficiency
- species richness